Two essays 750 words each, details below Essays

Two essays 750 words each, details below Essays Two essays 750 words each, details below Essay Two essays 750 words each, details below Essay Essay 1: Analysis of An Argument The first sentence of the argument sounds very persuasive and simple. If the research is based on a six-year statistics then the data is very reliable. The line â€Å"Our research indicated that, over the past six years, no incidents of employee theft have been reported within ten of the companies that have been our clients† tells a lot about the effective work of the security service. The fact that this data refers not to a single company that is a client of the security service but to ten of them gives more space for thinking that the work of the security service is really on a high level. At least we can say that the security service of the company perfectly copes with its responsibilities that refer to overseeing the correct behavior of the client’s employees. Often these procedures are the most difficult, because the working place and working process of each employee is a subject of privacy that is not allowed to be violated. If to read the second sentence better and connect it with what has been said in the first, we can find out that there is some of the misconnection between them. If the company provides the security services for its clients then it has to know everything about the security system that is established within its clients. It’s the basic job of any security service and here in the statement we find out the following line: â€Å" In analyzing the security practices of these ten companies, we have further learned that each of them requires its employees to wear photo identification badges while at work† It sounds like the company executes the role of the overseer over the security services of the company, but doesn’t provide the security services by itself. Otherwise it there wouldn’t be such a line as â€Å"analyzing the security practices of these ten companies, we have further learned†¦Ã¢â‚¬  These words say that the company doesn’t have a direct relationship to its clients if it doesn’t provide the security service or has no idea about the security practices that are established in these companies. Probably the director’s initial thought was to say that security services that were given to those ten clients had a practice of checking ID badges, while the security practice in other companies did not include that time of security practice. If it was the initial thought then the statement has to sound in another way, otherwise it will be misunderstood by the audience or will make them to perceive it from different sides, and different people will understand the meaning of it differently. The last sentence of the argument makes relatively clear what the speaker wanted to say, but still it doesn’t really sound in the way that would be understood easily and at once. To make the whole argument simpler for understanding it’s necessary to include the second statement of it to the very beginning so that the audience will have a better idea what the speaker wants to tell them. If he is going to tell about the importance of introducing the identification badges with pictures for the employees, because it increases the level of the security and he has a clear evidence of this fact then he has to say about it first as about a practice of security service, the company provides for its clients that have been very reliable and that have given the remarkable results. If these argument will be presented to the audience that has a direct relation to the company’s professional activity still it has to be changed in order to be understood quite well. The reason for a high professional performance of the security service in the companies that are the clients has to be told first, and only then the author of the statement has to inform about the res ults of this practice. This technique   of constructing an argument will sound more informative and clear and will definitely help the audience to catch the meaning real quick. So the argument has to sound somelike the following: â€Å"Our research indicated that, security practices in the companies where the photo identification badges were required to wear, appeared to be more effective as   there were no incidents of employee theft in a six-year period in the practice of ten examined companies. In the future, therefore, we should recommend the use of such identification badges to all of our clients.† In the case there is a clear connection of reason and consequence in the argument, it will be understood quite well. Essay 2: Analysis of An Issue To hire a new employee is quite a problem, which has no easy solution. And when hiring a person one has to rely on his ability to differ people and ability to choose the most appropriate candidates that would fit for the work which is proposed. Of course the previous work experience plays an important role as well as educational background, because it helps to make some kind of the relatively objective judgment about the candidate and helps to imagine his possible professional skills as well as the range of work he is familiar with. The only problem that the degree doesn’t characterize a professional as a human and as a personality, which is of a high importance as well especially if the person will have to work in the team. Most of the professionals who worked in a team or have been working on leading positions and who managed people would agree that on the hand with professional skills there are lots of other traits that are important for effective and productive work. They include communicative abilities, ability to think quickly and ability to learn. The last one is very important because it’s the fundamental of the effective work in our dynamically changing world. When a manager hires a new employee he has to take into consideration his personality and quickly make a judgment if the new person will pour into the working environment. So he has also to take into consideration, would the positive professional and personal traits of the new employee compensate the weak points of the working environment as well. Along with these traits many employers look on the previous work experience and ask for recommendations to know the personal side of the employee better. Every work requires the presence of the sense of responsibility and commitment to the work. It’s one of the integral parts of the proper and effective work as well as the trait that gives personal trust to the employee and makes the employee have a positive opinion about him. The sense of commitment to the work and responsible attitude often compensate no existing qualification in some types of the work. Many people will agree that it’s better to have a diligent executive, who may be not skilful in some of the questions and activities than to have a highly qualified professional but who is idle and supercilious. Finally the success of the business depends not on the level of the professionalism and qualification of the workers but on the final result and effective execution of work. The responsibility is one of the traits which is valued not only by the boss but by the colleagues as well. When people see that a person is responsible in the work they understand that he can be relied upon in real life situations that can happen anytime. Even so that relations between employees don’t pour clearly during the working process as they don’t usually have enough time for close communication and interaction, but still they plan an important role in the business process. Many people would say that they are more likely to easily communicate with people who have the same educational and cultural background, so this has to be taken into the consideration by the employer when he hires a new person. This is a very important moment as the negative perception of the new member of the working environment will make some sort of difficulties for him that would be difficult to overcome and it may result in his work. In general, the strategies for hiring people are quite different and everyone chooses the most appropriate for his point of view and for the professional activity that he proposes to possible employees. But the general principles often remain nearly the same, the employee has to be able to do the work and to work in the team or rule the team of other workers. Many people are more likely to hire those who seem to them enthusiastic, easy-to-go-with, and those who look optimistically on many things. It happens so probably because these people are easy to be managed and can easily feel the situation and can encourage others if they fail or help their colleagues in the hard minutes.. Another thing that most of employers should understand and look as on the guidance is that they are hiring not a robot or a machine, but a living human being, and that’s why they have to take into consideration â€Å"human factor† as well.